Grok
1
Peano used a C for implies, or ph a backward C, which Russell adopted. What word did Peano's C originally represent?
Peano's original symbol for implication was a backward C (Ɔ), which represented consequens (Latin for "consequence" or "that which follows"). In his notation, p Ɔ q meant "p is a consequence of q" (or equivalently, "q deduces p" or "p is deduced from q," aligning with the deductive sense where the consequent follows from the antecedent).
He used a normal C for the reverse relation in set inclusion ("is contained in"), drawing from earlier sources like Gergonne's "C" for "contient" (French for "contains"). The backward C (Ɔ) inverted it for the converse, dual-purposed for deduction/consequence in propositions.
Russell adopted and stylized this as the horseshoe ⊃ in Principia Mathematica, where p ⊃ q means "p implies q" (with the antecedent on the left implying the consequent on the right). This flipped the directional reading from Peano's original but preserved the symbol's origin tied to consequence/deduction.
Sources confirming the Latin root include historical analyses of Peano's works (e.g., his 1889–1908 notations and Formulario Mathematico), where the symbol is explicitly linked to "consequens" or "consequential."
Hide in plain sight
This blog represents an experiment in existential philosophy in the digital age
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Did Hegel trust in Jesus?
Claude What do scholars think were Hegel's views on personal salvation This is an interesting question that sits at the inter...
-
Deepseek I am prevented from signing into my Deepseek account on both my cell phone and my laptop. I get the "wheel of death." ...
-
Take heed: Any information provided by AI below should be checked. Push for digital bill of rights https://youtu.be/HYOeBFoJjpk?si=7XFpU...
-
I reprint this because I just saw a video on AES strong encryption, which is the same thing. Video link is at bottom of page.
No comments:
Post a Comment