Grok
1
Peano used a C for implies, or ph a backward C, which Russell adopted. What word did Peano's C originally represent?
Peano's original symbol for implication was a backward C (Ɔ), which represented consequens (Latin for "consequence" or "that which follows"). In his notation, p Ɔ q meant "p is a consequence of q" (or equivalently, "q deduces p" or "p is deduced from q," aligning with the deductive sense where the consequent follows from the antecedent).
He used a normal C for the reverse relation in set inclusion ("is contained in"), drawing from earlier sources like Gergonne's "C" for "contient" (French for "contains"). The backward C (Ɔ) inverted it for the converse, dual-purposed for deduction/consequence in propositions.
Russell adopted and stylized this as the horseshoe ⊃ in Principia Mathematica, where p ⊃ q means "p implies q" (with the antecedent on the left implying the consequent on the right). This flipped the directional reading from Peano's original but preserved the symbol's origin tied to consequence/deduction.
Sources confirming the Latin root include historical analyses of Peano's works (e.g., his 1889–1908 notations and Formulario Mathematico), where the symbol is explicitly linked to "consequens" or "consequential."
Hide in plain sight
This blog represents an experiment in existential philosophy in the digital age
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gemini on impending AI crash
Gemini: AI crash looms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXJd7mlUPTg How far in the future do you estimate that non-general intelli...
-
Deepseek I am prevented from signing into my Deepseek account on both my cell phone and my laptop. I get the "wheel of death." ...
-
ds agentic ai use the next token probability method, in th main? Completed 2 steps Yes—at the core, agentic AI systems still typical...
-
What is being done to curb the ballooning error cascades of agentic ai, and how effective are these methods (try to be quantitative as well...
No comments:
Post a Comment