Frankl's concepts, view of Jaspers. AI

Perplexity

Frankl. The Unconscious God

Viktor Frankl's "The Unconscious God"

"The Unconscious God" (originally Der Unbewußte Gott) is a 1949 book by Viktor E. Frankl, the founder of logotherapy and Holocaust survivor. It served as his 1948 PhD dissertation in philosophy and explores the intersection of psychology, spirituality, and the human search for meaning. ​

Core Concept

Frankl introduces "the unconscious God" as a hidden, innate spiritual dimension within every person—a pre-conscious orientation toward transcendence and ultimate meaning. Unlike Freud's instinctual unconscious, this "noetic unconscious" drives the "will to meaning," enabling individuals to connect with something greater, even in suffering like concentration camps.

Key Ideas and Methods

Frankl advocates Socratic dialogue in therapy to access this spiritual layer, arguing religiosity is a personal choice that fulfills life's purpose. He critiques Freudian determinism, asserting humans have an a priori God-directed drive that manifests in dreams, awe, or ethical decisions, accessible to believers and atheists alike.

Summary of Frankl's The Unconscious God key ideas

Viktor Frankl's The Unconscious God (originally his 1948 philosophy dissertation) posits an innate spiritual dimension in humans that transcends Freudian instincts. This "noetic unconscious" drives the will to meaning and connects individuals to transcendence, even amid suffering. ​

Unconscious God Concept

Frankl describes the "unconscious God" as a hidden, a priori orientation toward ultimate meaning or God, present in everyone regardless of belief. It manifests through conscience, awe, and ethical choices, guiding self-transcendence beyond psychological determinism.

Critique of Psychoanalysis

Rejecting Freud's id-focused unconscious, Frankl argues for a spiritual unconscious that enables freedom of will and meaning in suffering, as observed in concentration camps. Logotherapy uses Socratic dialogue to access this layer for personal wholeness.

Practical Implications

Key tenets include: a will to meaning over pleasure or power; meaning in unavoidable suffering via attitude; and conscience as a fallible, unique guide to values. Religiosity emerges as a personal response to this inner drive, fostering responsibility.

Frankl. Psychotherapy and Existentialism

Viktor Frankl's Psychotherapy and Existentialism, published in 1967, expands his logotherapy into existential philosophy, contrasting it with Freudian psychoanalysis and broader existential thought.

Logotherapy's Existential Core

Frankl positions logotherapy as the "Third Viennese School of Psychotherapy," emphasizing the human "will to meaning" over Freud's pleasure principle or Adler's power drive. It views existence as oriented toward self-transcendence, where meaning emerges through deeds, relationships, or attitudes toward suffering.

Key Distinctions from Existentialism

While sharing existentialism's focus on freedom and responsibility, Frankl rejects nihilistic views of meaninglessness, insisting life holds "super-meaning" beyond rational grasp. He critiques pure existential angst, advocating therapy that activates conscience to fulfill unique, situational meanings.

Therapeutic Applications

Frankl promotes "paradoxical intention" and "dereflection" techniques to counter existential vacuum—modern apathy from unmet meaning needs. This fosters responsibility: humans must respond to life's demands through action, not mere introspection.

Frankl, Jaspers attitudes toward each other

Frankl and Jaspers Shared Mutual Respect

Viktor Frankl and Karl Jaspers, both psychiatrists and existential thinkers, were aware of each other's work and exchanged correspondence, with Frankl explicitly acknowledging Jaspers' influence on his ideas. Jaspers viewed Frankl as a contemporary engaged in existential themes like existence and limit situations.

Frankl's Attitude Toward Jaspers

Frankl credited Jaspers (alongside Scheler) as a key philosophical foundation for logotherapy, citing his concepts in writings and confirming the influence personally in letters to Jaspers. He integrated Jaspers' notions of existence, limit situations (Grenzsituationen), and existential communication while adapting them practically.

Jaspers' Attitude Toward Frankl

Jaspers recognized Frankl's contributions to existential analysis and psychotherapy, seeing parallels in rejecting reductionism and emphasizing decisive action for meaning. Their correspondence reflected reciprocal understanding, though Jaspers remained more philosophical and less method-oriented than Frankl's applied approach.

Key Similarities and Differences

Both emphasized spiritual dimensions, responsibility in suffering, and freedom in limit situations like death, pain, and guilt—Jaspers via clarification of existence, Frankl via tragic triad and will to meaning. Frankl diverged by asserting objective, situational meanings accessible through therapy, unlike Jaspers' indefinable "possible existence."